Skip to main content

The danger of too much social media

in my post earlier, I outlined what I believe was too much social media, so here I will discuss how that is harmful.  To begin with, too much social media is when we rely on it to the point that we can't do a task without it.
The dangers in this are quite simple.  By using media too much, we won't be able to do anything ourselves.  If we couldn't use the internet of social networks, our society would essentially collapse.  We wouldn't be able to do anything as no one would know how to do it without using the internet.  Everyone relies on media to the point where no one knows how a task can be done without its use.  We as a society need to make sure that this never occurs, as a heavy reliance on the internet will cause for us to forget how to accomplish the task in the first place and lead to our collapse.
Another danger is the distraction that media causes.  Too much social media leads to us being distracted all the time, and once againg causes for us to not accomplish even the simplest of tasks.  The final and more hidden danger presented is how no one will know how to communicate.  Since people will be using media so much, it can easily lead to the collapse of communicating with each other in the real world.  We wouldn't be able to talk in a normal way as we will just be used to saying "lol" or "idk" in a text.  We won't truly know how to communicate leading to not being able to communicate outer actions with other people in the world.  Essentially, no one will know how to talk to each other and will simply end up passing through the world in silence.

Comments

  1. I agree with you when you say that we have become too reliant upon media, but I think that the concerns you have listed are a little far fetched. You made the argument that society depends upon media, I agree with that. Then you said that we have become so dependent upon media that we would not know how to do anything else without media, and it was because of that, that society would collapse. I would say that is a slippery slope fallacy. I find it hard to believe that we would not know how to do anything without media, and that society would collapse without it. Now I do believe that there are real concerns with the amount of media in our lives, but what you have stated I do not believe those are the problems. The loss of certain skills could be a problem. The loss of proper English and grammar when speaking and writing could be a possibility. The loss of certain manners when interacting with others is another possibility. I think you have the right idea, but you are going down a wrong path.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The solution

In response to the problem of media influencing opinions on women, I have three solutions. The first is to realize that the problem doesn't affect everyone. There are many people who have different opinions on women, and the documentary presented the extremes, rather than reality.  While this is a problem, we must know to see it when it is actually present, not just when we are told it is there. This brings me to my next solution, to be able to questions everything you hear or learn.  While there is a limit, we must realize that we can and should try to question information that we are given or at least learn more about the issue.  We shouldn't just take the facts that we are given, but learn to question it and process the information rather than just follow it.  We must be able to accept and reject information after we have actually had time to learn about it.  We shouldn't listen to what a small percentage of people say, simply because they are in charge of ...

The Modern Age of Technology

technology has come extremely far in the past few decades.  adults now had nowhere near the level of technology we have as kids.  and even the kids born in the past few years have come into a much more digitally advanced age than we did it used to be that the only way of communicating was through  mail and then slowly we have advanced to a time where you can talk to ten different people on a phone screen.  we used to have no such thing as the internet, where we could look up the answer to a question in a matter of seconds. but the question is how the rapid advancement affects us?  is it a good or a bad thing? this change in technology also causes for many people to see the world differently.  those who are born into this digital age will think less of it, as it has always been here for them.  they will also tend to use it more for not-needed uses.  those who were born before these advances began will think of it as being much more amazing than ...

Two Stories

No two articles are the same.  Even if the topic is similar, the writing can be very different.  One article could agree with the topic, and the other could disagree.  Or both could hold the same views, but express it in a completely different style, and go about convincing others using different words and tones. In this case, two articles about the new health care plan made by Donald Trump take this approach.  The first article, "Donald Trump releases health care reform plan," immediately shows how the writer dislikes the plan, due to installing doubt by saying the plan "aims" to improve healthcare by making it more affordable and better.  The word "aims" causes someone to think that they are trying to but won't actually succeed. The second article, "House Republicans Unveil Plan to Replace Health Law," begins by showing a more neutral tone towards the topic.  However, it does show how the plan will be more controversial.  It does this thro...